全域优化 r002 · P7 终报

轮次报告全文 · 逐字真源投影

本页是轮次报告的逐字投影（仅隐私清洗，零改写）。渲染不了的元素退化为代码块原文。

P7 Final Report — r002 v2 alldomain design run

Verdict and claim ceiling

Verdict: PASS_BOUNDED for the design-stage r002 v2 alldomain run.

Exact claim ceiling: r002 v2 produced and promoted a bounded, source-faithful, code-free design-spec projection for 13 context-infra domains, with P2 domain semantic review, P3 cross-domain synthesis, P4 decision packages, P5 candidate assembly and live design-spec promotion, and P6 validation. This report does not claim implementation completion, runtime behavior, production landing, live provider health, claude-kimi wrapper trace health, source-exhaustive proof, or cost/token proof from zero telemetry.

v2 versus v1

v1 failed as a formal output because proposal work was mostly single-completion/inlined rather than autonomous agentic sessions; resource and skill use were orchestrator-provided instead of worker-discovered; the provider-routing domain did not really converge; cross_cutting was pending; completion detection depended on fragile provider signals; and model/provider deviations were not consistently ledgered.

v2 corrected the run shape: it used a fresh isolated run root, an agentic canary gate, per-domain proposal gates, model deviation and provider runtime ledgers, independent domain reviews, a bounded P2 certification, P3/P4/P6 independent checks, run-local P5 candidate assembly, and a separate live design-spec promotion. v2 still remains design-stage: it fixed the evidence discipline around design production, not the code or runtime system itself.

13-domain result table

Representative source spot-checks: DDP DOMAIN_GATE.md, quality_gate_framework/SEMANTIC_REVIEW.md, provider_routing_self_invocation/SEMANTIC_REVIEW.md, cross_cutting/SEMANTIC_REVIEW.md, and all 13 final DESIGN.md markers were checked directly in addition to using DOMAIN_PROGRESS_STATUS.md as the table spine.

Resources and skills actually used

Run resources used: v2 execution order, domain and phase status files, v1 failure ledger, model deviation ledger, provider runtime summary, P1/P2/P3/P4/P6 gates, P3 global/design layers and resource ledger, P4 Codex and Opus decision packages, P5 candidate manifest/resource/session evidence, P6 validation, live promotion manifest/session evidence, representative domain gates/reviews, and final design markers.

Skills used by this fallback worker: workflow_phase_framework, workflow_phase_skill_trace_runtime, workflow_precise_reading, workflow_long_context_scale_up, workflow_session_claim_audit, workflow_solid_decision_review, workflow_solid_decision_phase, workflow_deferred_verification, workflow_landing_to_production, workflow_manage_unexpected, workflow_complexity_drift_detection, workflow_guidance_skill_matrix, workflow_orchestrator_mode, workflow_file_storage_and_requirement_protocol, workflow_tool_skill_evolution, workflow_unit_decomposition_and_context_injection, workflow_requirement_intake, and workflow_file_organization. The applicable effect here is reporting/claim discipline and handoff organization, not code implementation.

Phase evidence P0-P7

P0: v2 run tree, ledgers, source manifest, and failure/deviation ledgers exist. V1 failure modes were recorded and kept as contrast evidence, not continued as v2 truth.

P1: P1_AGENTIC_CANARY_LEDGER.md passed with accepted actual families Codex, Kimi, GLM/ZAI, and Opus. DeepSeek and OpenCode GLM attempts duplicated Kimi and were not counted for independent diversity.

P2: PHASE_P2_CERTIFICATION.md is CERTIFIED_BOUNDED; 13 domains are DONE_REVIEWED. This certifies bounded design-stage semantic review only.

P3: PHASE_P3_VERIFICATION.md is PASS_BOUNDED; GLOBAL_MEANING_LAYER.md and CROSS_DOMAIN_DESIGN_LAYER.md are first-class design/meaning layers. P3 preserves P2 caveats and adds no runtime proof.

P4: PHASE_P4_CHECK.md is PASS_BOUNDED; Codex and Opus produced independent decision packages, and ZAI/GLM independent check succeeded through claude-zai:high. P4 does not certify decision correctness or implementation.

P5: run-local candidate assembly produced the required Design Spec candidate files and evidence. A later promotion worker copied the P6-validated projection into live requirements/design_spec/ and wrote PROMOTION_MANIFEST.md and PROMOTION_SESSION_EVIDENCE.md, still with design-stage ceiling.

P6: PHASE_P6_VALIDATION.md is PASS_BOUNDED; it validates the candidate as source-faithful, code-free, run-local before promotion, and explicitly excludes implementation/runtime/provider health claims.

P7: the first Opus P7 attempt under raw/phase_dispatch/p7_report_handoff_opus/ produced zero-byte router/result files and only wrote work/implementation_handoff/plan.yaml; treat it as a runtime/return-path caveat, not report evidence. The Codex fallback P7 worker wrote the final report, implementation handoff, and handoff evidence with the same bounded claim ceiling. Its final router result JSON is non-empty and reports tier_used=codex:high, attempts=[], and duration_seconds=642.2, but still has Codex-channel zero-turn/zero-cost telemetry; accepted P7 evidence is therefore the non-empty dispatch result plus deterministic file, marker, and scope checks, not cost/token telemetry.

Kimi/Ollama and ZAI/GLM treatment

Kimi/Ollama: late retry succeeded for provider_routing_self_invocation and cross_cutting through ollama:high --model-override kimi-k2.7-code, with complete artifacts and non-empty result JSONs. This is Ollama/OpenCode route evidence and can count for proposal diversity in those domains. It does not prove claude-kimi Claude Code wrapper trace health, effective served model identity beyond the explicit route/override evidence, or general Kimi availability.

ZAI/GLM: ZAI should not be globally blamed. The run observed bounded 529/timeout/provider instability in specific attempts, and some ZAI-high attempts failed or fell back incorrectly. But P1 accepted claude-zai:high as GLM/ZAI canary evidence, several domains accepted claude-zai:medium, and P4 independent check succeeded through claude-zai:high. Current evidence supports route-specific caveats, not a global ZAI/GLM unavailability claim.

Residual risks

• All domain outputs and promoted design spec remain design-stage. Implementation slices, runtime wiring, dogfood, and production landing are deferred.
• Some route telemetry is zero-byte or artifact-only; zero-byte result JSONs cannot support duration, cost, turn count, served model identity, or clean return-path claims.
• Codex-channel zero-turn/zero-cost telemetry cannot be treated as token/cost proof.
• quality_gate_framework review/convergence, P7 Opus, and this fallback dispatch have return-path caveats.
• Provider route identity, especially claude-kimi wrapper trace health and OpenCode/Ollama equivalence, requires future direct checks.
• Named seams remain unimplemented: gate_manifest.yaml, RouteDecision, route_resolver.py, refresh_bus.py, requirement_io.py, worker_inject.py, capabilities.yaml, TODO domain registry/apply events, git health/release boundary, final report packet, and the walking skeleton.
• BUG-016/git production health is carried as a live failing invariant, not fixed here.

Forbidden claims

• Do not claim implementation is complete.
• Do not claim runtime/production behavior works.
• Do not claim live provider health.
• Do not claim claude-kimi wrapper trace health from Ollama/OpenCode evidence.
• Do not treat Codex zero-turn/zero-cost telemetry as cost/token proof.
• Do not upgrade PASS_BOUNDED, CERTIFIED_BOUNDED, VERIFIED_BOUNDED, CHECKED_BOUNDED, or VALIDATED_BOUNDED into production proof.
• Do not claim P7 Opus produced report evidence; it produced only a plan and zero-byte return-path files.

P7-FINAL-REPORT-V2-DONE