context-infra 检查与复盘infra.guiming.net · 全内容自包含呈现 · 生成于 2026-07-21 16:28 UTC

Run3 · final_report 域收口报告

Z3 全文↑ Z2 条目

轮次报告全文 · 逐字真源投影

← 返回报告库 · Base Tooling buildout 轮次

本页是轮次报告的逐字投影(仅隐私清洗,零改写)。渲染不了的元素退化为代码块原文。

时点提示:本页是仓内文件 adhoc_jobs/context_infra_base_tooling_buildout_20260615/Run3/reports/DOMAIN_final_report_CLOSURE_REPORT.md 的逐字投影(仅做隐私清洗:仓库根绝对路径→相对路径、家目录→~/;除此零改写)。若源文件后续有修订,以仓内真源为准。

Run3 final_report Closure Report

What Closed

FR-S1 landed the final-report evidence backbone:

Landed commits:

Verification

Mechanical checks:

Consumption and A/B:

The eval_harness verdict is PASS. The real-condition A/B result is positive PASS and negative FLAG with rc6-unresolved-evidence issues, which is the expected fail-closed behavior.

Domain Evaluation

Independent evaluations:

Non-accepted broad claude-zai and claude-kimi attempts are retained only as worker-prompt trace. They are not counted as closure evidence.

The Codex and opencode evaluators flagged the same administrative caveat: aggregate GAP-FR-001 was still IN_FLIGHT before closure. That is now closed in Run3/rcl/final_report.jsonl; later-slice residuals remain separate DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARY rows.

RCL State

Run3/rcl/final_report.jsonl is closed for this bounded slice:

There are no SATISFIED rows carrying residual gaps.

Residual Table

idstateboundary
FR-X01DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYunified_gate.base migration waits for quality_gate_framework-owned substrate migration and parity tests.
FR-X03DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYFull report_state_snapshot auto-collection waits for upstream domains to expose real collectible records.
FR-X04DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYGate id/profile pinning waits for FR-S1/FR-S3 dogfood evidence.
FR-X05DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYtools/final_report facade waits for packet/gate dogfood and stable profile shape.
FR-X07DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYSkill-routing docs wait for FR-S1/FR-S2 shipped CLI and stable packet fields.
FR-X09DEFERRED_WITH_BOUNDARYPlan-loader enforcement remains rejected unless a new design reopens loader behavior.

Caveats

This closure does not prove organic adoption, cross-domain integration, production-final readiness, FR-S2 producer/rendering, FR-S3 semantic hidden-residual regulation, FR-S4 default plan insertion, FR-S5 unified-gate/doc/facade work, or any other domain's closure.

The strongest supported claim is: FR-S1 makes final-report packet evidence and shell-profile deterministic checks landed, tested, consumed through eval_harness, and verified by positive/negative replay under a bounded claim ceiling.


← 返回报告库 · Base Tooling buildout 轮次